Most interventions target process. orchiture.ai diagnoses the structural layer: the design decisions that determine what is actually possible.
Regardless of what process sits on top.
When delivery is slow, the reflex is to change process: add Scrum, refine the backlog, run better retrospectives. These can help. But they rarely hold.
If the role boundaries are wrong, if there is no one doing the tactical product ownership work at team level, sprint planning will keep producing under-defined work regardless of how the ceremony is facilitated. Structure determines what is possible. Diagnosing the structural layer tells you which problems are fixable with process changes and which require something deeper.
Structure determines what is possible. Process determines how you use it.
Self-organisation behaviours, psychological safety, healthy conflict, commitment, collective accountability, individual versus collective throughput orientation.
Product ownership model, backlog management, role clarity, vision alignment, prioritisation ownership: the structure between strategy and delivery.
Cycle time, CI/CD discipline, definition of done and ready, estimation discipline, build and test practices, code ownership and integration patterns.
The named structural conditions orchiture.ai is designed to surface: the root causes that produce the delivery problems CTOs experience.
The assessment begins with the problems you recognise. Each selection votes for the structural conditions most likely causing it. The question set is built from the conditions with the most votes.
15 questions drawn from the structural condition banks most relevant to your situation. The questions are observational: what you have seen happening, not judgements about how good the team is.
The output names the structural condition at work. The diagnosis references your specific answers to make the finding concrete. It tells you what the structural cause is. That is the right starting point for any intervention.